Skip to main content

Trigger Planting 2.0 Exhibition Catalog: Section 2: MAPPING: Varying Access redraw Territories

Trigger Planting 2.0 Exhibition Catalog
Section 2: MAPPING: Varying Access redraw Territories
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeTrigger Planting 2.0
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. China
  2. Introduction
  3. Section 1: ARTISTS & COLLABORATORS
  4. Section 2: MAPPING: Varying Access redraw Territories
    1. I: US Map
    2. II: Global Case Studies Map
    3. III: Exhibition Photos
    4. IV: Exhibition Screen Slideshow
    5. V: Interview - Kadambari Baxi
  5. Section 3: PLANTING and FORAGING: Abortifacients evoke Histories
    1. I: Plant List (As Planted)
    2. II: Garden, Trigger Planting
    3. III: Shelf Display Plants
    4. IV: Interview - Landon Newton
  6. Section 4: ERASING: Roe v Wade (Dobbs) disappears Clinics
    1. I: Erasure Essay (Working Title) Draft
    2. Footnotes For Draft Of Erasure
    3. II: Interview with Maureen Connor
  7. UNEARTHING: Case Studies outline Global Access and Barriers
    1. Italy
    2. India
    3. Mexico
    4. Colombia
    5. Mozambique
    6. South Africa
    7. Norway
    8. Poland
    9. United States
    10. I: Polyphonies Global Abortion Voices - Resource Guide
    11. II: Timeline Key Dates All Countries
  8. WORKSHOPPING: Conversations with Guests
    1. I: Abortion In Data And In Reporting - Resource Guide
    2. II: Abortion In Data And In Reporting - Quotes
    3. III: Study Break
  9. READING: Current books on Reproductive Health and Barnard Archives
  10. Bookmarks
  11. CONTINUING QUESTIONS
  12. APPENDIX

Trigger Planting uses mapping as a conceptual visual technique. The process begins by assembling current laws, data, and politics on reproductive healthcare access. Editing and layering key information and policies, the graphical maps are designed as large banners and slide-shows. As synthetic documents, they highlight the uneven status of reproductive healthcare around the country. As public interfaces, they provoke conversations on abortion issues. While the maps reveal complexities of access based on location, they frame an overall message that is simple: abortion is healthcare, all people have a right to healthcare.


The exhibition, which opened a month before the US elections, is introduced with a map that represents the US as a fragmented nation. Displayed as a large mesh banner, similar to a political "propaganda" banner. Showing where and when abortion is banned or legal, the states on the map are redrawn as color-coded clusters. Closer to the elections, additional labels mark the states where abortion is on ballots. In a second round, the ballot results are posted as additional labels. This kind of “live” mapping points to the constantly changing laws and politics of reproductive healthcare.



TP 2.0 Banner in Milstein Lobby
TP 2.0 Banner reverse

For the overall exhibition, the hanging banner also acts as a spatial divider. Providing an overview as people enter or leave the main lobby, it creates a more private space behind the banner for reviewing a rotating set of materials contained in a book-shelf wall: dried herbs and plants, images and timelines, books and postcards, all related to cultural, political and medicinal histories of reproductive justice.


A smaller set of rotating maps are included on a screen-slide show…


Annotate

Next Chapter
I: US Map
PreviousNext
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org