Skip to main content

Accessibility and Disability Representation in Scholarly Publishing: Plain Text of Presentation Slides

Accessibility and Disability Representation in Scholarly Publishing
Plain Text of Presentation Slides
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Issue HomeScholarly Communications Librarianship, no. 1
  • Journals
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
This text does not have a table of contents.

Slide 1: Barriers and Biases:

The Importance of Accessibility and Disability Representation in Scholarly Publishing

Carleen Crespo, MLIS (Student)

University of Maryland College Park


Slide 2: Learning Objectives

By the end of this presentation, learners should be able to:

Define “disability” and “ableism” in the context of accessibility and scholarly publishing

Identify common barriers to accessibility that impact scholars with disabilities

Reference relevant laws and regulations for ensuring accessibility in scholarly materials

Apply best practices to improve the accessibility of scholarly publications, making research more inclusive

Advocate for increased representation of people with disabilities in scholarly research by recognizing systemic challenges and promoting equitable solutions

Identify and describe alternatives to traditional scholarly publishing

Slide 3: Introduction


In 2019–20, some 21 percent of undergraduates and 11 percent of postbaccalaureate students reported having a disability (National Center for Education Statistics)

“…defined as those who reported having deafness or serious difficulty hearing; blindness or serious difficulty seeing; serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition; or serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs”

Lack of access and overall representation can have consequences outside of academia, such as poor health outcomes and patient care (CDC)

As academic librarians are on the front line, they have the potential to make the most impact!


Slide 4: Definition of Disability

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Definition

A disability is any condition of the body or mind (impairment) that makes it more difficult for the person with the condition to do certain activities (activity limitation) and interact with the world around them (participation restrictions).

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Definition

A person with a disability is someone who:

has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,

has a history or record of such an impairment (such as cancer that is in remission), or

is perceived by others as having such an impairment (such as a person who has scars from a severe burn)

Application to an academic context


Slide 5: Definition of Ableism

“Bias, prejudice, and discrimination against people with disabilities. It hinges on the idea that people with disabilities are less valuable than nondisabled people” (Villines, 2021)

Medical vs. Social models of disability

Application to an academic context

“…the neoliberalisation of higher education has created productivity expectations, which contribute to the silencing of the disabled academics’ perspectives and experiences due to constructions of normality and stigmatization” (Brown & Ramlackhan, 2021)


Slide 6: Access Barriers

Poor knowledge of Copyright Laws

Limited Accessible Formats: Less than 10% of published works globally include accessibility features, such as alt-text for images or customizable text formats

PDF Accessibility: Many scholarly articles are distributed in PDF format, but studies show that only about 3.2% of tested PDFs meet accessibility standards, while nearly 75% fail all criteria. This issue has actually worsened since 2019, particularly among open-access papers (Kumar & Wang, 2024)

Lack of Captioning and Transcripts for audio and video content

Accessibility of Research Tools and Environments

Inaccessible software/platforms: Many data analysis tools, journal submission systems, and collaborative platforms are not designed with accessibility in mind (e.g., lack of screen reader support or keyboard navigation)

Physical access issues: Students with mobility impairments may have difficulty accessing labs, libraries, or field sites essential to their research


Slide 7: Research Barriers

Attitudinal Barriers and Ableism

Implicit bias: Faculty or peers may underestimate the capabilities of students with disabilities, offering fewer research opportunities

Lack of mentorship: There may be a shortage of mentors who understand both the challenges of academia and the nuances of disability accommodations

Discomfort in asking for accommodations or disclosing a disability

Limited accommodations: Universities may not adequately support research-specific accommodations (e.g., extended time for data collection, access to research assistants)

Communication Barriers

Students with learning disabilities or neurodivergence may struggle with expectations around structure, tone, and language

Difficulties with traditional academic writing norms


Slide 8: Publishing barriers

Paywalls, author fees

Limited Disability Disclosure: Many scholars with disabilities hesitate to disclose their conditions due to stigma or concerns about career impact (Brown & Leigh, 2018)

Inaccessible Publishing Processes

Journal websites and submission portal are often poorly designed for assistive technologies

Editorial and Peer Review Disparities: Disabled scholars are often underrepresented in editorial positions, affecting the diversity of perspectives in academic publishing

Peer review bias: Disclosure of disability (intentional or unintentional) may lead to biased evaluations

Funding disparities: Grants and fellowships often do not factor in the additional costs students with disabilities may incur (e.g., accessible travel, assistive tech).

Limited publishing format options - Publications not accepting alternative formats:

Negative bias toward disability


Slide 9: Benefits and losses

“It is the acknowledgement of the wholeness of our human experience and its potential. Persons with disabilities contribute to both our individuality and collectivity….recruiting disabled people as research partners diversifies qualitative, quantitative, and participatory research by contributing to scholarship and improving disability-based evidence research.” (Ndagire, 2024)


Slide 10: Legal Obligations: ADA

In the U.S., academic libraries are legally required to provide equitable access to all users, including those with disabilities. This obligation is reinforced by laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which mandates accessibility in public accommodations (part of state and local government), including university libraries

NOTE: The burden falls on the libraries, and not the publishers (Axelrod, 2018)


Slide 11: Legal Obligations: Copyright Laws

Marrakesh Treaty and Section 121A of U.S. copyright law allow institutions to create and share accessible versions of scholarly texts for individuals with disabilities

Chafee Amendment to the U.S. Copyright Act110 provides exemptions of copyright law, allowing for copyright works to be reproduced in formats that are accessible for individuals with print-related disabilities (Wentz, et al, 2023)

The Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled is a WIPO-based treaty adopted in June 2013

provides for obligations for member states to have minimum limitations and exceptions to copyright to allow the creation and distribution of accessible format works and also to permit cross-border sharing of these formats (ACRL)

Slide 12: Moving Forward: Best Practices


Slide 13: As Librarians and Educators, 1

Collaboration and integration!!!

Normalize Disability Disclosure

Improve disability awareness in academic communities

Provide disability-aware training for supervisors, mentors, and research staff

Encourage Disability-informed mentoring programs and networks

Promote stories and visibility of successful disabled researchers who have lived experience

Foster Communities

Support peer-led disability affinity groups or writing circles

Connect students with professional organizations for disabled scholars

National Center for College Students with Disabilities, Chronically Academic, etc.


Slide 14: As Librarians and Educators, 2

Equitable Accommodation Policies

Extend disability accommodations to cover research work, not just coursework or exams

Allow for flexible timelines, remote participation, and alternative research methodologies

Targeted Funding and Support

Create grants specifically for disabled researchers to cover additional research costs (e.g., travel support, assistants, accessible tech)

Include accessibility support as a budget line in research funding applications

Accessible and Inclusive Research Infrastructure

Ensure all research software, library systems, lab equipment, and data platforms are compatible with assistive technologies

Design lab spaces and fieldwork options with universal access in mind


Slide 15: As Scholarly Publishers

Improved collaboration between libraries, publishers, and researchers

Use Accessible Publishing Platforms

Ensure submission portals and peer review systems comply with accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1)

Adoption of universal design in research and publishing platforms

Accept alternative formats (e.g., visual, video, audio summaries, etc.) following the Digital Humanities model

Bias-Free Peer Review

Train reviewers on inclusive and respectful feedback, and how to avoid ableist assumptions

Encourage double-blind review to minimize bias related to disability disclosure.

Support content on disability studies and inclusive research practices


Slide 16: Alternatives to Traditional Publishing

1. Open Access Repositories and Preprint Servers

Examples: arXiv, SSRN, bioRxiv, OSF Preprints, Humanities Commons

Benefits: Freely accessible to all, removes paywall barriers, less rigid formatting requirements

2. Multimodal and Creative Scholarship

Formats: Podcasts, videos, graphic novels, visual essays, zines, digital storytelling

Platforms: YouTube (educational channels), SoundCloud (for podcasts), Scalar (for multimedia scholarship), Vimeo

Benefits: Accessible to individuals with different learning styles or communication preferences

3. Digital Humanities and Interactive Publishing

Platforms: Manifold, Scalar, Omeka (for digital exhibits)

Benefits: Allows users to annotate, interact, and contribute

Alternatives to Traditional Publishing, 2

4. Personal and Academic Blogs

Platforms: WordPress, Medium, Substack, university-hosted blogs

Benefits: Informal, self-published, and highly flexible, no editorial gatekeeping

5. Social Media

Examples: Twitter threads, Instagram infographics, TikTok explainers

Benefits: Rapid dissemination and public engagement

6. Alternative Academic Journals

Examples: Disability Studies Quarterly (open access)

7: Open Peer Review and Transparent Publishing

Platforms: F1000Research, PubPub, Peer Community In (PCI)

Benefits: Inclusive feedback and transparent editorial processes


Slide 17: Learn More: Resources

Resources for Researchers with Disabilities | Grants & Funding

Disability Advocacy and Research Network - DARN Disability

Accessible Books Consortium (ABC): accessiblebooksconsortium.org

AHEAD (Association on Higher Education and Disability)

Center for Universal Design in Education Overview | DO-IT

Autistic Self Advocacy Network

Chronically Academic

National Center for College Students with Disabilities (Home | National Center for College Students with Disabilities

ADA National Network

Slide 18: Thank You!

Annotate

Next Chapter
Carleen References
PreviousNext
CC-BY-NC 4.0
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org